WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.380 --> 00:00:06.700
Your F.D.A. Is Unsafe and Ineffective A drug passes every safety test your species invented.

2
00:00:07.100 --> 00:00:13.020
It won't hurt you. Everyone agrees. You still can't have it for another eight point two years.

3
00:00:13.640 --> 00:00:17.120
There is, however, no waiting list for dying. No one blocks that.

4
00:00:17.820 --> 00:00:26.140
The testing costs forty-four point one times more than proven alternatives and excludes eighty-six point one percent of

5
00:00:26.140 --> 00:00:33.880
the patients who'll actually take it. For every one unit of harm prevented, the system creates three thousand and seventy

6
00:00:33.880 --> 00:00:42.060
through denied access. Here's how to fix it. For every one unit of harm prevented by efficacy delays, the system creates

7
00:00:42.060 --> 00:00:46.000
three thousand and seventy units of harm through denied access.

8
00:00:47.040 --> 00:00:52.220
Operational safety ratio: three thousand and seventy-to-one against the patient.

9
00:00:53.200 --> 00:01:00.260
In nineteen sixty-two, your Congress decided that after proving a drug won't kill you, sick people should wait another eight

10
00:01:00.260 --> 00:01:06.180
point two years before they're allowed to take it. The drug passed safety testing.

11
00:01:06.280 --> 00:01:10.380
It won't kill you, won't melt your liver, won't make your hair migrate to your back.

12
00:01:11.280 --> 00:01:16.800
But you can't have it, because a committee needs to spend eight point two years making sure it works well enough.

13
00:01:17.820 --> 00:01:21.210
I asked someone why, and they said "we need to confirm efficacy."

14
00:01:21.800 --> 00:01:27.720
I said, "The patient is dying." They said, "Yes, but we don't know if the drug works."

15
00:01:28.060 --> 00:01:32.000
I said, "The patient could tell you, if you gave it to them."

16
00:01:32.520 --> 00:01:37.420
They said that's not how it works. I said, "Dying is how it works?"

17
00:01:37.920 --> 00:01:41.220
They changed the subject, which I suppose is also how it works.

18
00:01:41.800 --> 00:01:46.020
You're not allowed to volunteer for the trials that would answer the question faster, either.

19
00:01:46.720 --> 00:01:53.540
You are, however, allowed to die. Nobody blocks that. There's no eight point two years waiting period on dying.

20
00:01:54.540 --> 00:01:58.240
On Wishonia, when we confirm something won't harm you, we let you try it.

21
00:01:58.760 --> 00:02:03.380
On Earth, you lock it in a cabinet and form a committee. The committee meets quarterly.

22
00:02:03.800 --> 00:02:10.940
You decompose on a different schedule. A Note on Blame. When this chapter says "the F.D.A.

23
00:02:11.000 --> 00:02:16.400
does X," read it as "the nineteen sixty-two law requires the F.D.A.

24
00:02:16.400 --> 00:02:20.300
to do X." Congress wrote the rules. The F.D.A. follows them.

25
00:02:20.700 --> 00:02:27.100
Blaming the F.D.A. is like blaming the gun instead of the person who loaded it, aimed it at patients, and pulled the trigger

26
00:02:27.100 --> 00:02:35.620
on a sixty-two-year schedule. "But What About Safety?" This is the part where humans panic, so let me be very precise about

27
00:02:35.620 --> 00:02:44.640
what this chapter is (and isn't) proposing: keep Phase One safety testing (it works, it caught thalidomide, nobody is suggesting

28
00:02:44.640 --> 00:02:51.660
you skip it). Do *radically more* efficacy testing, on *real patients*, with *transparent results*.

29
00:02:52.420 --> 00:02:56.420
But stop holding known-safe drugs hostage while you run the trials.

30
00:02:57.040 --> 00:03:04.000
On Wishonia, we don't have a word for "preventing someone from accessing a safe substance that could help them while they

31
00:03:04.000 --> 00:03:08.100
die." It would never occur to us to do it, so we never needed a word.

32
00:03:08.780 --> 00:03:13.280
You have several words for it. My favorite is "the approval process."

33
00:03:13.960 --> 00:03:23.400
The forty-four point one times inefficiency tax. Compare two real-world systems for testing drugs: The Oxford RECOVERY Trial

34
00:03:23.400 --> 00:03:30.820
tested COVID treatments on forty-eight thousand patients for five hundred dollars and found a life-saving treatment in three

35
00:03:30.820 --> 00:03:39.480
months, like a normal species would. The post-nineteen sixty-two system averages forty-one thousand dollars per trial and

36
00:03:39.480 --> 00:03:43.720
takes over a decade to approve a new drug, like humans would.

37
00:03:44.260 --> 00:03:53.340
Your efficacy testing system costs forty-four point one times more and takes thirty-two point eight times longer than necessary.

38
00:03:54.020 --> 00:03:56.980
I showed these numbers to a human and they said "that can't be right."

39
00:03:57.820 --> 00:04:01.480
So I showed them the sources and they said "well, there must be a reason."

40
00:04:02.400 --> 00:04:09.000
There is a reason. The reason is that your system costs forty-four point one times more and takes thirty-two point eight

41
00:04:09.200 --> 00:04:15.100
times longer. That's the reason and also the problem. They're the same thing.

42
00:04:15.900 --> 00:04:25.600
The eight point two years Efficacy Lag. Here's where your lifespan goes to die: Phase One (Safety Testing) lasts two point

43
00:04:25.600 --> 00:04:34.080
three years and tests if the drug harms people: death, organ damage, mutations, serious adverse reactions, all the ways

44
00:04:34.080 --> 00:04:43.760
a molecule can ruin your day. *This part works. Keep it.* Phase Two slash Three (Efficacy Testing) takes eight point two

45
00:04:43.760 --> 00:04:49.880
years. The drug is now *known safe*. But patients can't have it until the committee is satisfied.

46
00:04:50.820 --> 00:04:59.080
*This is where people die waiting for a drug that already passed every safety check your species invented.* What the nineteen

47
00:04:59.080 --> 00:05:07.840
sixty-two Efficacy Requirements Changed. Before nineteen sixty-two, one hundred and forty-four thousand physicians tested

48
00:05:07.840 --> 00:05:14.900
treatments on real patients and published results. Life expectancy grew three point eight two years every decade for eighty

49
00:05:14.900 --> 00:05:20.040
straight years. Things were going well. Naturally, Congress intervened.

50
00:05:20.060 --> 00:05:25.160
Phase One safety testing (added in nineteen thirty-eight) prevented all U.S.

51
00:05:25.160 --> 00:05:32.140
thalidomide deaths while Europe had thousands. So in nineteen sixty-two, Congress looked at a system that was working and

52
00:05:32.140 --> 00:05:39.960
thought, "What if we made this much worse?" They added massive pre-approval efficacy requirements via the Kefauver Harris

53
00:05:39.960 --> 00:05:43.640
Amendment, blocking patient access for years during testing.

54
00:05:44.360 --> 00:05:51.800
The cost of developing a drug went from twenty-four point seven million dollars to two point six billion dollars, a one

55
00:05:51.800 --> 00:05:56.730
hundred and five times increase. New drug approvals dropped by seventy percent.

56
00:05:57.160 --> 00:06:05.320
Life expectancy gains slowed from three point eight two years per decade to one point five four, a sixty percent reduction.

57
00:06:06.020 --> 00:06:10.680
Time to approval stretched from two to three years to ten point five years.

58
00:06:11.600 --> 00:06:19.580
Everything got worse at exactly the same time. Every single metric, all at once, the moment the law passed.

59
00:06:20.280 --> 00:06:27.240
I'm not a statistician so I can't tell you whether that's a coincidence, but I did look at the graph, and it's not a coincidence.

60
00:06:27.680 --> 00:06:32.040
The one hundred and five times cost increase is rigorously documented.

61
00:06:32.180 --> 00:06:37.620
See Drug Development Cost Analysis for methodology, sensitivity analysis, and source data.

62
00:06:38.400 --> 00:06:46.740
The Modern Consequences. Even if you think historical analysis is just opinions with footnotes, the current system's failures

63
00:06:46.740 --> 00:06:51.120
are happening right now: One. A cure passes safety testing.

64
00:06:52.040 --> 00:07:00.820
Two. You can't take it (pending efficacy review). Three. You can't join the trial either (too sick, too old, wrong medications).

65
00:07:01.500 --> 00:07:10.040
Four. You die. Five. The F.D.A. approves the cure. Six. Pharmaceutical companies charge your widow ten thousand dollars

66
00:07:10.040 --> 00:07:15.200
per pill. I read this sequence several times because I kept thinking I'd got the order wrong.

67
00:07:15.820 --> 00:07:24.260
I hadn't. That is the correct order. The system works exactly like that, on purpose, and everyone involved considers it

68
00:07:24.260 --> 00:07:32.120
a success because nobody skipped a step. High Costs Kill Innovation, Reward Monopoly.

69
00:07:32.140 --> 00:07:39.580
Before nineteen sixty-two: Genius scientist invents cure, raises a few million, tests safety, gives it to people.

70
00:07:39.940 --> 00:07:48.240
Like a civilization that wants to survive would. Now: Genius scientist must convince one of three mega-corporations to fund

71
00:07:48.240 --> 00:07:55.700
trials. Those corporations already sell inferior drugs for the same condition, bringing in hundreds of millions a year per

72
00:07:55.700 --> 00:08:04.940
drug. The math for the mega-corporation: Option one: Develop the better drug Cost: two point six billion dollars on average

73
00:08:04.940 --> 00:08:12.620
to get a single drug to market. That figure already includes the cost of the nine candidates that fail for every one that

74
00:08:12.620 --> 00:08:16.260
succeeds, so the ten percent success rate is already priced in.

75
00:08:17.080 --> 00:08:21.090
Best case, the drug works: you now have a better drug for the same condition.

76
00:08:21.740 --> 00:08:25.810
But your old drug, which was bringing in hundreds of millions a year, is now obsolete.

77
00:08:26.560 --> 00:08:30.480
You spent two point six billion dollars to replace your own revenue stream.

78
00:08:31.400 --> 00:08:37.400
Every year the new drug is on the market, it's earning roughly what the old drug would have earned anyway, minus the two

79
00:08:37.400 --> 00:08:46.640
point six billion dollars hole you dug getting here. Option two: Buy the patent, put it on a shelf Your inferior drug keeps

80
00:08:46.840 --> 00:08:53.020
bringing in hundreds of millions a year. Total cost: whatever the patent costs, which is rounding error compared to two

81
00:08:53.020 --> 00:09:00.300
point six billion dollars. I asked a pharmaceutical executive which option they'd choose and they said "it's more nuanced

82
00:09:00.660 --> 00:09:05.340
than that." Then I asked which one they chose and they said Option two.

83
00:09:05.780 --> 00:09:12.200
So it wasn't more nuanced than that. The profit incentive doesn't just fail to reward better treatments.

84
00:09:12.580 --> 00:09:20.720
It actively punishes them. The best possible outcome of Option one is the same annual revenue you already had, minus two

85
00:09:20.720 --> 00:09:25.460
point six billion dollars. Curing disease is economically irrational.

86
00:09:26.200 --> 00:09:31.000
The system doesn't need a conspiracy to suppress cures. It just needs the math.

87
00:09:31.660 --> 00:09:34.280
I keep waiting for someone to show me where the math is wrong.

88
00:09:34.960 --> 00:09:41.980
Nobody shows me where the math is wrong. They just look uncomfortable and say "it's complicated," which I've learned is

89
00:09:41.980 --> 00:09:45.440
what humans say when it isn't complicated and they don't like the answer.

90
00:09:46.480 --> 00:09:54.660
Off-Patent Drugs and Rare Diseases: Mathematically Doomed. The nineteen sixty-two law made it mathematically impossible

91
00:09:54.680 --> 00:10:02.200
to cure diseases that aren't profitable enough: Ninety-five percent of diseases are rare: a development cost of two point

92
00:10:02.200 --> 00:10:09.900
six billion dollars divided by a patient population of about ten thousand patients equals two hundred and sixty thousand

93
00:10:09.900 --> 00:10:17.400
dollars per patient. No patent equals no funding because off-patent drugs can't attract billion-dollar investments.

94
00:10:18.460 --> 00:10:24.560
Pre-specification kills serendipity as you must predict what drug cures before testing.

95
00:10:25.460 --> 00:10:31.120
When something costs more, you get less of it. I looked this up and apparently it's the first thing they teach in economics.

96
00:10:31.620 --> 00:10:36.340
It is also, somehow, the last thing anyone considers when writing health policy.

97
00:10:37.560 --> 00:10:42.120
Ninety-five percent of diseases have zero treatments. Not because cures are impossible.

98
00:10:42.620 --> 00:10:49.280
Because cures are unprofitable. The best thing a disease can do for itself, career-wise, is be popular.

99
00:10:50.200 --> 00:10:59.320
The Actual Death Toll of "Drug Lag". Economists call it "drug lag," which is a lovely, clinical way of saying "people rotting

100
00:10:59.320 --> 00:11:03.780
to death in a queue for drugs that have already been confirmed not to hurt them.".

101
00:11:04.720 --> 00:11:10.360
Early estimates: twenty-one thousand to one hundred and twenty thousand American lives per decade.

102
00:11:11.340 --> 00:11:18.040
But that was just the U.S. A comprehensive quantitative analysis using W.H.O.

103
00:11:18.100 --> 00:11:26.900
mortality data estimates the *total* cost of the eight point two years *post-safety* efficacy delay (the lag *after* drugs

104
00:11:26.900 --> 00:11:32.880
are known safe): four hundred and sixteen million eventually avoidable deaths.

105
00:11:33.460 --> 00:11:42.920
Including years lived with disability: seven point nine four billion disability-adjusted life years, or D.A.L.Y.s, of healthy

106
00:11:42.920 --> 00:11:52.460
human life deleted. Economic cost: one point one nine quadrillion dollars (twenty twenty-four U.S.

107
00:11:52.540 --> 00:12:01.100
dollars), reflecting those seven point nine four billion D.A.L.Y.s valued at one hundred and fifty thousand dollars per

108
00:12:01.100 --> 00:12:07.480
D.A.L.Y., the standard normative rate used in W.H.O. cost-effectiveness analyses.

109
00:12:08.360 --> 00:12:14.440
Even if those death estimates are off by a factor of ten, that's still tens of millions of deaths.

110
00:12:14.820 --> 00:12:23.540
And the inefficiency is independently verifiable: the efficacy testing process costs eighty-two times more per patient and

111
00:12:23.540 --> 00:12:29.460
takes thirty-two point eight times longer than proven alternatives like the Oxford RECOVERY trial.

112
00:12:30.500 --> 00:12:39.380
Those numbers don't depend on mortality estimates at all. Here's a news story from the Non-Existent Times by No One Ever,

113
00:12:39.520 --> 00:12:45.380
without a picture of all the people who die from lack of access to life-saving treatments that might have been.

114
00:12:45.960 --> 00:12:50.760
You can't photograph millions of people who died from *not* receiving a drug.

115
00:12:51.540 --> 00:12:56.120
There's no body with a toe tag reading "cause of death: regulatory delay."

116
00:12:56.600 --> 00:13:03.900
They die of cancer, heart disease, Alzheimer's. The delay that killed them is invisible, so nobody writes the headline.

117
00:13:05.340 --> 00:13:11.080
Types of Error in F.D.A. Approval Decision If the drug is beneficial and the F.D.A.

118
00:13:11.120 --> 00:13:16.440
allows it, that is a correct decision. If the drug is harmful and the F.D.A.

119
00:13:16.460 --> 00:13:20.180
allows it, victims appear on television and the regulator is fired.

120
00:13:21.060 --> 00:13:27.080
If the drug is beneficial and the F.D.A. does not allow it, victims die at home and nobody is fired.

121
00:13:27.980 --> 00:13:32.860
If the drug is harmful and the F.D.A. does not allow it, that is a correct decision.

122
00:13:33.680 --> 00:13:40.050
So the F.D.A. has two kinds of mistakes. One where they give you a bad drug and you die on television.

123
00:13:40.680 --> 00:13:44.100
And one where they don't give you a good drug and you die at home.

124
00:13:45.140 --> 00:13:50.790
They've decided the second one doesn't count, which is convenient because it's the one they do most.

125
00:13:51.580 --> 00:13:56.240
The most infamous case: beta-blockers. Europe used them to prevent heart attacks.

126
00:13:57.100 --> 00:14:02.260
The U.S. delayed for a decade, killing an estimated one hundred thousand Americans.

127
00:14:02.640 --> 00:14:07.120
More than died in Vietnam and Korea combined. From one drug.

128
00:14:07.200 --> 00:14:11.100
That they had. That they knew worked. That they put in a drawer.

129
00:14:12.180 --> 00:14:18.720
I asked someone if there was a word for killing one hundred thousand people by not doing something, and they said "it depends

130
00:14:18.720 --> 00:14:25.600
on the context." I think one hundred thousand dead people is the context, but apparently that's not enough context.

131
00:14:26.780 --> 00:14:33.840
After nineteen sixty-two, U.S. life expectancy diverged from Switzerland's (which didn't introduce the same delays).

132
00:14:34.680 --> 00:14:40.380
More drug approvals in the eighties narrowed the gap. Fewer approvals in the nineties widened it again.

133
00:14:41.080 --> 00:14:45.320
The pattern is not subtle. I showed it to a child and the child understood it.

134
00:14:45.960 --> 00:14:49.250
I showed it to a policy expert and they said it was "multifactorial."

135
00:14:50.700 --> 00:14:57.840
I think "multifactorial" is what adults say when they can see the same thing the child can see but have reasons not to say

136
00:14:57.840 --> 00:15:03.000
it out loud. How the Incentives Work. F.D.A. Regulator Decision Tree.

137
00:15:03.960 --> 00:15:08.160
Approve drug that later shows problems. Congressional hearing (televised).

138
00:15:08.980 --> 00:15:14.300
"F.D.A. APPROVED KILLER DRUG" headlines. Career ends. Pension threatened.

139
00:15:15.200 --> 00:15:20.130
Delay drug that could save lives. Nothing happens. Nobody writes a headline.

140
00:15:20.440 --> 00:15:26.330
Promotion on schedule. Retire to pharma job. To be fair, this isn't a conspiracy.

141
00:15:27.000 --> 00:15:31.700
It's just a system where the only career-ending move is letting patients access treatments.

142
00:15:32.380 --> 00:15:39.540
If you approve a bad drug, C.N.N. says your name. If you delay a good drug, nobody dies on television.

143
00:15:40.080 --> 00:15:46.900
So the rational move is to delay everything, and that's what happens, and everyone who could object is dead, which does

144
00:15:46.900 --> 00:15:52.320
simplify the feedback process. Dr. Henry I. Miller ran the F.D.A.

145
00:15:52.560 --> 00:15:56.940
team reviewing recombinant human insulin in the early nineteen eighties.

146
00:15:57.540 --> 00:16:02.600
Mountains of evidence showed it was safe and effective. His supervisor refused to approve it.

147
00:16:03.140 --> 00:16:07.980
If someone died from the drug, heads would roll. If people died waiting for the drug?

148
00:16:08.260 --> 00:16:12.100
Nothing happens. Dead patients don't testify before Congress.

149
00:16:12.420 --> 00:16:18.080
I checked. The Math: Why Current Regulations Increase Total Harm.

150
00:16:18.080 --> 00:16:25.040
Even generously crediting ALL drug withdrawals to the nineteen sixty-two changes (ignoring that Phase One safety testing

151
00:16:25.040 --> 00:16:33.800
already existed), the prevented harm totals approximately two point five nine million disability-adjusted life years, or

152
00:16:33.800 --> 00:16:39.040
D.A.L.Y.s. The delay harm totals seven point nine four billion D.A.L.Y.s.

153
00:16:40.260 --> 00:16:47.220
For every one unit of harm prevented, the current system creates three thousand and seventy units of harm through delay.

154
00:16:47.760 --> 00:16:51.660
The safety net catches one person and drops three thousand and seventy.

155
00:16:52.340 --> 00:17:00.940
On Wishonia, we'd call that a hole, not a net. Clinical Trial Theater: Excluding eighty-six point one percent of Reality

156
00:17:00.940 --> 00:17:08.099
Makes Drugs More Dangerous. To be clear: Phase One safety testing should exclude vulnerable populations.

157
00:17:08.780 --> 00:17:15.880
You don't give an untested molecule to a pregnant woman. But once a drug clears safety, the efficacy trials that follow

158
00:17:15.880 --> 00:17:22.859
*also* exclude those populations, which means nobody learns whether the drug works for the people who will actually take

159
00:17:22.859 --> 00:17:31.000
it, or what interactions to expect. Then the drug is approved for everyone, and the post-market surveillance system (the

160
00:17:31.000 --> 00:17:37.820
Adverse Event Reporting System, or F.A.E.R.S.) catches less than ten percent of adverse events.

161
00:17:38.320 --> 00:17:42.100
So the exclusions create a data gap, and nothing ever fills it.

162
00:17:42.940 --> 00:17:50.900
The F.D.A. requires rigorous safety trials. Good. Then it runs efficacy trials on people who aren't sick, aren't old, aren't

163
00:17:50.900 --> 00:17:54.970
on other drugs, and aren't pregnant. I read this three times.

164
00:17:55.620 --> 00:18:02.100
They test whether drugs work on people who don't need the drugs, to predict whether they'll work for people who do need

165
00:18:02.100 --> 00:18:06.840
the drugs, who are different people, with different bodies, taking different medications.

166
00:18:07.320 --> 00:18:10.820
Then they act surprised when the second group has a reaction.

167
00:18:11.340 --> 00:18:16.140
I would call this stupid but I think it might actually be something worse than stupid.

168
00:18:16.780 --> 00:18:24.920
Stupid doesn't usually have a peer-review process. Trials under the current system exclude: Patients over sixty-five: Most

169
00:18:24.920 --> 00:18:29.480
people who actually take medications (excluded due to "comorbidities").

170
00:18:30.040 --> 00:18:34.300
Patients under eighteen: All children (metabolism differs from adults).

171
00:18:34.760 --> 00:18:39.940
Pregnant women: Excluded entirely (then drugs prescribed during pregnancy anyway).

172
00:18:40.440 --> 00:18:45.900
Anyone with comorbidities: The sickest patients most likely to have adverse reactions.

173
00:18:46.480 --> 00:18:51.660
Anyone on other medications: Everyone elderly (can't detect drug interactions).

174
00:18:52.220 --> 00:18:55.690
Anyone too far from trial sites: Poor and rural populations.

175
00:18:56.560 --> 00:19:03.460
It's like testing whether a car is safe by driving it very slowly into a nice cushion, and then selling it to people who

176
00:19:03.460 --> 00:19:08.420
drive into walls. And when they die you say "well, it was safe when WE tried it."

177
00:19:08.800 --> 00:19:17.690
Which is true. It was. Result: In antidepressant trials alone, eighty-six point one percent of real patients are excluded.

178
00:19:18.180 --> 00:19:25.620
The drugs are tested on the healthiest people alive, declared "safe and effective," then handed to everyone the trial specifically

179
00:19:25.620 --> 00:19:33.100
avoided. Nobody knows whether the drug works for those populations, what the interactions are, or what the real adverse

180
00:19:33.100 --> 00:19:41.620
event profile looks like. This is how Vioxx, Fen-Phen, and Bextra all got approved, celebrated, prescribed to millions,

181
00:19:41.960 --> 00:19:47.280
and then withdrawn after killing people whose demographics the trials had carefully excluded.

182
00:19:48.000 --> 00:19:51.600
The eight point two years delay didn't make these drugs safer.

183
00:19:52.020 --> 00:19:56.720
It made them seem safer by hiding the danger behind an exclusion list.

184
00:19:57.280 --> 00:20:04.600
Testing drugs only on unrepresentative volunteers to prove they work is like testing parachutes only on the ground.

185
00:20:05.000 --> 00:20:09.100
The parachute worked perfectly, by the way. It just wasn't falling at the time.

186
00:20:10.120 --> 00:20:14.540
No Long-Term Outcome Data. Data collection can be as short as several months.

187
00:20:15.100 --> 00:20:20.960
You take the drug for forty years. The gap between these two numbers is where side effects live.

188
00:20:21.580 --> 00:20:24.980
Nobody checks. It's like reviewing a marriage based on the wedding.

189
00:20:25.620 --> 00:20:33.460
Pre-Specification Requirements Kill Innovation. The regulations require drug developers to predict exactly what a treatment

190
00:20:33.460 --> 00:20:40.080
will cure before testing it on humans. You must know the answer before you're allowed to ask the question.

191
00:20:40.800 --> 00:20:48.360
I asked if this was how science works and they said "it's how regulatory science works," which I think means "no, but we

192
00:20:48.360 --> 00:20:56.580
gave it the same name.". In two thousand and seven, Dendreon showed that its immunotherapy drug Provenge significantly reduced

193
00:20:56.580 --> 00:21:02.020
deaths from prostate cancer. The F.D.A. advisory committee agreed it worked.

194
00:21:02.040 --> 00:21:06.840
Then the F.D.A. rejected it anyway. Not because it didn't save lives.

195
00:21:07.300 --> 00:21:12.800
Because Dendreon filled out the wrong form about which lives it was planning to save.

196
00:21:13.580 --> 00:21:20.500
"People stopped dying" wasn't good enough. The paperwork predicting that people would stop dying wasn't filed in the right

197
00:21:20.500 --> 00:21:28.640
order. Three more years and another trial were required. During those three years, people who could have stopped dying continued

198
00:21:28.640 --> 00:21:36.180
dying, but at least the forms were correct. On Wishonia, we have a saying: "The gravestone was filed on time."

199
00:21:36.660 --> 00:21:42.240
It means someone prioritized procedure over the thing the procedure was supposed to protect.

200
00:21:42.820 --> 00:21:47.120
We retired the saying because it kept applying to too many situations.

201
00:21:47.620 --> 00:21:54.540
You could use it daily. Due to these additional costs, Dendreon filed for chapter eleven bankruptcy.

202
00:21:55.120 --> 00:22:00.580
So the approval process killed the patients, then killed the company trying to save them.

203
00:22:01.220 --> 00:22:04.380
You have a phrase for this: "killing two birds with one stone."

204
00:22:04.840 --> 00:22:09.940
Although in this case the stone was paperwork and there were considerably more than two birds.

205
00:22:10.520 --> 00:22:14.880
But you can't count the dead birds who would have been cured by a company you bankrupted.

206
00:22:15.400 --> 00:22:20.600
The Blinding Catch-22: How Knowing a Drug Works Proves It Doesn't.

207
00:22:21.340 --> 00:22:28.740
M.D.M.A. was synthesized in nineteen twelve. By the nineteen seventies, therapists were using it to treat trauma, and an

208
00:22:28.740 --> 00:22:33.260
estimated half a million doses were administered in therapeutic settings.

209
00:22:33.340 --> 00:22:40.300
In nineteen eighty-five, the government scheduled it. In nineteen eighty-six, Rick Doblin founded the Multidisciplinary

210
00:22:40.300 --> 00:22:46.060
Association for Psychedelic Studies, or M.A.P.S., to get it approved for P.T.S.D.

211
00:22:46.700 --> 00:22:54.260
Thirty-eight years and over one hundred and forty million dollars in philanthropic funding later, they ran two successful

212
00:22:54.260 --> 00:23:02.080
Phase three trials. Sixty-seven percent of participants no longer met the diagnostic criteria for P.T.S.D.

213
00:23:02.480 --> 00:23:06.620
The drug worked. Veterans with treatment-resistant P.T.S.D.

214
00:23:06.620 --> 00:23:11.200
got better. The F.D.A.'s own advisory committee reviewed the data.

215
00:23:11.200 --> 00:23:20.400
They voted nine to two that it wasn't effective. The problem: patients could tell they'd taken M.D.M.A., because M.D.M.A.

216
00:23:20.400 --> 00:23:25.220
makes you feel things, which is how it treats P.T.S.D., which is the point.

217
00:23:25.740 --> 00:23:31.180
About ninety percent of participants in the drug group correctly guessed they weren't on placebo.

218
00:23:31.740 --> 00:23:37.020
The F.D.A. called this "functional unblinding" and said it invalidated the results.

219
00:23:37.580 --> 00:23:42.580
I want to make sure I understand the logic. The drug works by making you feel profoundly different.

220
00:23:43.440 --> 00:23:47.300
The F.D.A. requires that you not know whether you feel profoundly different.

221
00:23:47.980 --> 00:23:53.520
If you notice that you feel profoundly different, the trial fails, because you weren't supposed to notice.

222
00:23:54.160 --> 00:23:58.160
The drug's mechanism of action is, itself, a protocol violation.

223
00:23:59.080 --> 00:24:06.180
This is not a fixable design problem. You cannot double-blind a drug whose therapeutic effect is that the patient feels

224
00:24:06.180 --> 00:24:14.240
it working. The F.D.A. knows this. They granted M.D.M.A. "Breakthrough Therapy Designation" in twenty seventeen, signaling

225
00:24:14.240 --> 00:24:20.460
that yes, this looks promising, please spend another seven years and tens of millions of dollars on Phase three trials.

226
00:24:21.480 --> 00:24:27.220
Then they rejected it for a property of the molecule that was evident before the trials began.

227
00:24:28.540 --> 00:24:34.800
On Wishonia, if you tell someone to build a house and then condemn it for having walls, you owe them a house.

228
00:24:35.360 --> 00:24:38.800
Here, you owe them nothing. The veterans kept their P.T.S.D.

229
00:24:39.080 --> 00:24:44.380
The F.D.A. kept its process. Everyone kept exactly what they had, which was the problem in the first place.

230
00:24:45.580 --> 00:24:53.100
Meanwhile, approximately forty-nine thousand Americans kill themselves every year, including six thousand four hundred veterans

231
00:24:53.100 --> 00:24:57.820
at twice the civilian rate. About thirteen million Americans have P.T.S.D.

232
00:24:57.840 --> 00:25:02.160
in any given year, and P.T.S.D. nearly quadruples your suicide risk.

233
00:25:03.320 --> 00:25:09.600
M.D.M.A.-assisted therapy produced a sixty-seven percent remission rate versus thirty-two percent for standard care.

234
00:25:10.240 --> 00:25:16.420
Even conservatively, if half of P.T.S.D. patients had accessed the treatment over the forty years since it was scheduled,

235
00:25:16.920 --> 00:25:22.980
the thirty-five-percentage-point improvement in remission would have prevented something on the order of thirty thousand

236
00:25:22.980 --> 00:25:31.120
suicides in the U.S. alone, and freed millions of people from a condition that destroys families, drives substance abuse,

237
00:25:31.580 --> 00:25:39.740
and fills your homeless shelters with veterans. A molecule that Merck synthesized the same year the Titanic sank is sitting

238
00:25:39.740 --> 00:25:44.220
in regulatory limbo because the people it helped could tell it was helping them.

239
00:25:45.340 --> 00:25:51.500
I looked for the word that describes letting thousands of people kill themselves each year while a known-effective treatment

240
00:25:51.500 --> 00:25:57.030
waits for someone to solve an unsolvable blinding problem, and the closest I found was "process.".

241
00:25:58.600 --> 00:26:04.520
Small Trials Are Dangerous. Phase three trials test one thousand to three thousand patients.

242
00:26:05.180 --> 00:26:10.660
A one-in-ten-thousand adverse event is mathematically invisible in a trial of three thousand.

243
00:26:11.580 --> 00:26:17.980
Then the drug goes to millions. After approval, the F.D.A. monitors safety using the F.D.A.

244
00:26:18.160 --> 00:26:25.940
Adverse Event Reporting System, or F.A.E.R.S., a system where doctors voluntarily report problems if they feel like it.

245
00:26:26.020 --> 00:26:29.380
It captures less than ten percent of actual adverse events.

246
00:26:30.260 --> 00:26:37.900
Vioxx killed an estimated thirty-eight thousand to fifty-five thousand Americans before this honor system noticed.

247
00:26:38.580 --> 00:26:45.620
That's more people than died in the entire Korean War, detected by a system that relies on doctors filling out optional

248
00:26:45.620 --> 00:26:51.620
paperwork. I want to be clear: the eight point two years delay is supposed to be for safety.

249
00:26:52.180 --> 00:26:56.000
And then the safety monitoring after approval is a suggestion box.

250
00:26:56.640 --> 00:27:00.300
You waited eight point two years to get to the suggestion box.

251
00:27:00.880 --> 00:27:09.120
A decentralized F.D.A. with ten million participants catches one in ten thousand reactions, includes real populations, tracks

252
00:27:09.120 --> 00:27:14.480
long-term outcomes, and provides automated surveillance instead of voluntary paperwork.

253
00:27:15.300 --> 00:27:20.650
You have a fax machine and a suggestion box. One of these is a safety system.

254
00:27:21.260 --> 00:27:25.140
The other is a prayer with an eight point two years waiting period.

255
00:27:26.180 --> 00:27:34.400
The Negative Results Black Hole. Here's something that would be illegal if anybody important cared: Thirty-seven percent

256
00:27:34.400 --> 00:27:41.000
of negative trial results are published. Ninety-four percent of positive trial results are published.

257
00:27:41.200 --> 00:27:47.340
Approximately one hundred billion dollars is wasted annually repeating failed experiments.

258
00:27:48.100 --> 00:27:54.580
Companies are allowed to hide when drugs don't work. Restaurants can't hide when they fail a health inspection.

259
00:27:55.180 --> 00:27:58.440
I checked this twice because I thought I was wrong, but I wasn't.

260
00:27:59.040 --> 00:28:03.260
A sandwich has more regulatory transparency than chemotherapy.

261
00:28:04.060 --> 00:28:08.400
I don't know what to do with that information but I've had it for three days now and it won't go away.

262
00:28:08.840 --> 00:28:13.940
Company: "We tested this drug!". Regulator: "Did it work?".

263
00:28:14.660 --> 00:28:22.340
Company: "...We tested this drug!". Pharmaceutical companies bury negative results deeper than Jimmy Hoffa.

264
00:28:23.200 --> 00:28:31.580
Other companies waste billions testing the same dead ends. Your insurance premiums fund this magnificent inefficiency.

265
00:28:32.040 --> 00:28:39.660
It's like casinos only having to report when people win. Actually, I think casinos DO have to report when people win.

266
00:28:39.800 --> 00:28:46.080
So drugs get less honesty than gambling. I keep finding these comparisons and they keep getting worse.

267
00:28:47.440 --> 00:28:56.420
Countries That Don't Have Our "Safety". Japan gives conditional approval after Phase Two with real-world data collection.

268
00:28:56.920 --> 00:29:00.820
Time to patient: two to three years. Americans fly there for treatment.

269
00:29:01.620 --> 00:29:06.680
The E.U. lets terminal patients access experimental drugs at a doctor's discretion.

270
00:29:07.300 --> 00:29:11.140
I asked the F.D.A. what might go wrong and they said "the patient could die."

271
00:29:11.640 --> 00:29:17.010
The patient is already dying. "Yes," they said, "but they could die differently."

272
00:29:18.060 --> 00:29:25.100
I waited for the rest of the sentence but that was it. Right to Try (U.S.) passed despite F.D.A.

273
00:29:25.100 --> 00:29:29.180
opposition. The F.D.A. made it effectively impossible to use.

274
00:29:29.840 --> 00:29:33.700
The law says you can *ask* a manufacturer for their experimental drug.

275
00:29:34.060 --> 00:29:42.460
The manufacturer can say no. They almost always say no, because the law provides no liability protection, no funding mechanism,

276
00:29:42.560 --> 00:29:49.700
and no insurance coverage. So "Right to Try" means "Right to Ask a Corporation for a Favor While Dying."

277
00:29:50.280 --> 00:29:54.480
Corporations said no. Patients helped: fewer than two hundred total.

278
00:29:54.940 --> 00:30:00.950
Patients who wanted help: tens of thousands. On Wishonia, "Right to Try" is just called "rights."

279
00:30:01.800 --> 00:30:10.440
The fact that your species needed a special law to allow dying people to take known-safe drugs, and then made the law effectively

280
00:30:10.440 --> 00:30:17.000
unusable, is the most human thing I've ever observed. You named it "Right to Try."

281
00:30:17.460 --> 00:30:22.350
The name was accurate, which was so unusual for your species that it should have been suspicious.

282
00:30:23.020 --> 00:30:26.480
And it was: the law doesn't work. The naming convention holds.

283
00:30:27.520 --> 00:30:35.740
The COVID Test Fiasco. January twenty twenty: W.H.O. develops COVID test, world starts using it.

284
00:30:36.740 --> 00:30:42.460
February: F.D.A. blocks all non-C.D.C. tests to "ensure quality."

285
00:30:43.340 --> 00:30:47.700
The C.D.C. tests were contaminated. Private labs begged to help.

286
00:30:48.420 --> 00:30:53.520
Late March: F.D.A. finally allows other tests after thousands die.

287
00:30:54.380 --> 00:30:58.900
The only approved tests didn't work. The unapproved ones did.

288
00:30:59.420 --> 00:31:04.980
The F.D.A. blocked the ones that worked to ensure the quality of the ones that didn't.

289
00:31:05.720 --> 00:31:10.480
I've written this paragraph four times now and it keeps sounding like I'm making it up, but I'm not.

290
00:31:11.140 --> 00:31:16.260
That is what happened. In order. On purpose. The Bottom Line.

291
00:31:17.040 --> 00:31:21.180
To be fair to the F.D.A., the system does eventually approve most good drugs.

292
00:31:21.480 --> 00:31:28.080
So if you think about it, the system works. Unless you were one of the people who died waiting, in which case the system

293
00:31:28.080 --> 00:31:34.740
worked slightly less well for you specifically. But you're dead, so you can't complain, which means the system has a one

294
00:31:34.740 --> 00:31:38.000
hundred percent satisfaction rate among living participants.

295
00:31:38.680 --> 00:31:41.720
That's actually quite impressive if you don't think about it.

296
00:31:42.860 --> 00:31:49.100
It is not a safety system. It is a filing system that produces corpses as a byproduct.

297
00:31:49.800 --> 00:31:56.640
The only thing missing is the political will to admit that a law signed before the Beatles existed might not be the pinnacle

298
00:31:56.640 --> 00:32:01.440
of pharmaceutical regulation. The Beatles broke up. The law didn't.

299
00:32:02.060 --> 00:32:10.840
Draw your own conclusions. Technical Analysis. For the full quantitative analysis including methodology, sensitivity analysis,

300
00:32:10.940 --> 00:32:18.520
and source data (warning: contains numbers large enough to make you physically ill), see: invisible hyphen graveyard dot

301
00:32:18.520 --> 00:32:24.900
war on disease dot org. *P.S. The F.D.A. will likely object to this chapter.

302
00:32:25.400 --> 00:32:30.640
Estimated response time: twelve to fifteen years, pending Phase Three review and proper documentation.*